LinkedIn Removes Transgender Protections Following Meta and YouTube

LinkedIn has quietly eliminated its policy prohibiting misgendering and deadnaming of transgender users, following similar rollbacks by Meta and YouTube earlier this year. The Microsoft-owned platform confirmed the change this week but did not explain removing protections that barred deliberate use of incorrect pronouns or birth names to harass transgender individuals.

This marks the third major tech platform to retreat from LGBTQ+ safety commitments in 2025. In January, Meta overhauled its hate speech policies to permit users to call LGBTQ+ people “mentally ill” and endorse excluding them from professions, schools, or public spaces. Its updated Community Standards include the term “transgenderism,” a right-wing trope implying being trans is an ideology, and permit phrases like “trans people are mentally ill” and “get these tr*nnies out of my school”.

Industry-Wide Regression

Meta’s policy shift set a dangerous precedent. As Sarah Kate Ellis, CEO of GLAAD, stated: “Meta is now an anti-LBGTQ company. These changes will harm users and make Meta’s platforms unsafe for everyone”. YouTube followed days later with comparable protections removed.

LinkedIn’s decision is particularly jarring given its professional networking purpose. “Platforms that encourage anti-LBGTQ hate and violence are unsafe for youth and advertisers,” Ellis added. Internal Meta training materials reviewed by journalists confirm moderators were instructed to allow previously banned slurs and harmful rhetoric targeting LGBTQ+ users.

Real-World Harms

Research consistently links online hate to offline violence. Amnesty International reported a 60% surge in anti-LBGTQ+ abuse on Twitter alone after Elon Musk’s takeover, with 88% of reported hate speech ignored by moderators. GLAAD’s 2024 Social Media Safety Index found all major platforms failing LGBTQ+ users, noting that Meta-owned properties hosted over 100 posts with the slur “tr*nny” without removal.

“Online harassment is directly linked to offline hate,” emphasized Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson. The FBI’s 2023 hate crime data showed anti-LBGTQ+ attacks rising faster than any other category.

Broader Implications

TechDirt editor Mike Masnick contextualizes these policy shifts as part of “a strategy to deepen divisions and erode democracy.” The timing coincides with concerning political shifts: Meta donated $1 million to Donald Trump’s inaugural fund and installed Joel Kaplan, a GOP operative, as Global Policy Chief.

While LinkedIn, Meta, and YouTube still nominally prohibit hate speech based on gender identity or sexual orientation, their carveouts for harmful rhetoric create enforcement gaps. As Michael Kleinman of Amnesty International notes, marginalized voices face being “shouted down and silenced” in digital spaces.

What Comes Next?

Advocates urge regulatory intervention. “Social media platforms must take substantive action to prioritize LGBTQ+ safety,” GLAAD’s 2024 Social Media Safety Index concluded. Until then, the burden falls on users to navigate increasingly hostile online ecosystems.

For LinkedIn professionals, journalists, and LGBTQ+ employees, the removal of deadnaming protections signals that even “professional” spaces may no longer shield them from targeted harassment. As platforms abandon moderation, the human cost compounds daily.

Subscribe to my whatsapp channel