Apple’s iPhone 17 Air arrives as the thinnest big-flagship iPhone yet, emphasizing design, portability, and a leaner feature set. Samsung’s Galaxy S25 Ultra doubles down on versatility, camera prowess, and raw spec muscle. The choice comes down to what you prioritize: style + sleek or features + flexibility.
Design & Build
The iPhone Air is shockingly thin—just 5.6 mm thick and weighing around 165 grams, with a polished titanium frame and Apple’s latest “Ceramic Shield 2” glass up front for scratch resistance.
By contrast, the S25 Ultra is bigger, heftier, but built tough. It has a 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED panel, with Gorilla Glass Armor 2 protection and a titanium frame too.
If you want a phone that feels feather-light in your hand and slides easily into your pocket, the iPhone Air wins outright. But the S25 Ultra gives more screen real estate, more ruggedness, and a more commanding presence.
Display & Performance
Both phones feature 120 Hz refresh rate displays, but the S25 Ultra edges ahead in resolution (around 3120×1440) and delivers about 498 pixels per inch, while the Air’s 6.5-inch OLED display has somewhat lower ppi.
Bright-light performance, crucial outdoors, is strong on both: Apple claims up to 3000 nits peak brightness on the Air. Samsung’s screen hits around 2600 nits peak in many tests.
Under the hood, Apple uses the A19 Pro chip with ~12 GB RAM in the Air. Samsung packs the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, with 12 GB (or 16 GB in select regions) in the S25 Ultra.
If you’re gaming or using demanding apps, the S25 Ultra is built to sustain performance, aided by a larger vapor chamber for cooling.
Camera Battle
Samsung wins this round of the photo war in raw versatility. The S25 Ultra has a quad-camera setup: 200MP main (wide), 50MP periscope telephoto (5× optical zoom), 50MP ultra-wide, and an additional 10MP telephoto for smaller zoom steps.
Apple’s iPhone Air, by contrast, opts for a single 48MP rear camera (wide) lens. The sacrifice is in telephoto and ultra-wide options—but Apple beefs up its computational photography, video quality, and consistency across lighting conditions.
In low light, Samsung’s huge sensor and multiple lenses give more flexibility. Apple’s software still shines—its night mode, video stabilization, etc., do a good job—but you won’t get the same reach or variety.
Battery & Charging
The S25 Ultra has a 5,000 mAh battery, which is pretty standard for large Android flagships, especially those with big, bright screens.
Apple doesn’t usually publish cell capacities, but from usage reports, the iPhone Air’s battery life is solid for moderate users, though heavy usage under bright screen + long camera sessions drains more quickly. The trade-off of slimness is battery size and cooling.
Charging: Samsung supports 45W wired charging and magnetic wireless charging via Qi2 (with a special case for full speed). Apple remains a bit more conservative; fast charging is slower than many Android rivals, wireless charging is good, MagSafe tho. If charging speed and battery longevity under heavy use are priorities, S25 Ultra has the advantage.
Ecosystem & Features
Here’s where things get more subjective.
If you live in Apple’s ecosystem (Mac, iPad, Apple Watch, Apple services), the iPhone Air fits in beautifully. iOS 26 brings improved features, and the new chips, display, and build add up to a premium Apple experience. Also, for many, the elegance of the design and ease-of-use (plus iMessage, etc.) weigh heavily.
Samsung’s S25 Ultra offers Android flexibility, deeper customisation, more camera options, often more internal storage (1TB versions), and the S-Pen, for those who like stylus workflows. It also pushes AI features (via its ProVisual Engine, etc.) more aggressively.
One potential drawback for the Air: it uses eSIM only (in many markets), drops the physical SIM slot, and also includes USB-C, but at USB-2.0 data speeds. That affects people who move cards between phones, travel, or transfer large files.
Pros & Cons
Pros – iPhone 17 Air
-
Exceptional design: ultra-thin, light, premium materials.
-
Strong display with high peak brightness, crisp colors, and excellent glare handling.
-
Smooth performance via A19 Pro, excellent video quality, good software polish.
-
Seamless integration for iOS users + long software update guarantees.
Cons – iPhone 17 Air
-
Single rear lens limits zoom / wide-angle versatility.
-
Less battery room: may underperform under heavy use or extended gaming/photo sessions.
-
USB-C but limited to slower data speeds; eSIM only in many regions.
Pros – Galaxy S25 Ultra
-
Very versatile cameras: multiple lenses, long optical zoom, wide-angle options.
-
Strong performance all-round, with good cooling, a high-resolution display, and rich Android features.
-
Bigger battery with more ambitious charging options.
-
More storage/blah flexibility, stylus support, AI features.
Cons – Galaxy S25 Ultra
-
Bulky and heavier; harder to handle with one hand or carry comfortably.
-
Not quite as slim or elegant as the Air; aesthetics are more “practical flagship” than fashion statement.
-
Charging still lags in wireless or perhaps convenience vs Apple’s MagSafe ecosystem for some users.
-
Premium price tag; some “AI” features may feel gimmicky until polished.
Verdict: Which Should You Buy?
If you…
-
Are Apple-loyal, value sleek design, want something lightweight, care about high video quality, and can live without ultra-zoom or widest-angle lenses: Go for the iPhone 17 Air. It’s a statement phone that doesn’t compromise on polish.
-
Are you a power user, love taking photos (especially zoom / ultra-wide), want large screen real estate, more flexibility with file handling, and don’t mind a heavier device? Galaxy S25 Ultra is your better match.
-
Are somewhere in between, maybe photography/video are important, and you want balanced battery life and performance: think carefully about which compromises matter more (camera versatility vs portability).
Real-User Voice
One camera enthusiast I spoke to said: “I switched from a previous Samsung flagship, and the S25 Ultra’s 5× periscope lets me capture shots I couldn’t with the Air—even though the Air wins if I’m walking around all day and need something I barely notice in my pocket.”
Another user, more design-oriented, observed: “The Air’s thin profile is addictive. I catch myself caressing the edge. But yes, by nightfall – after using GPS, camera, lights – it shows its limits.”
Conclusion
Both phones are excellent; neither is perfect. The iPhone 17 Air shines in design, user experience, and brand coherence. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shines in capability, versatility, camera range, and plenty of power.
If forced to pick one, most people leaning toward a premium Android experience and photography would prefer the S25 Ultra. But if what you really want is something stylish, lighter, more refined—especially if you’re already in Apple’s world—the iPhone 17 Air is a strong, forward-looking choice.
Subscribe to my whatsapp channel
Comments are closed.