Trump allegedly utilized AI to write mangled executive orders.

Legal experts are voicing some of the most scathing concerns possible about Donald Trump’s use of AI in the drafting of executive orders. They have characterized the language in many of these orders as “sloppy” and poorly drafted.

Economists Robert Reich pointed out that during his very first day, Trump signed 16 orders that bore close resemblance to proposals found in Project 2025’s Heritage Foundation. This relationship begs the question of originality and quality.

Many of Trump’s orders are unclear, cumbersome, and filled with mistakes. This creates considerable confusion for Trump if any of the said orders are examined by a court of adjudication.

One executive order, which has taken the most criticism, asserted that there exist only two genders: male and female. It went on to state that a person’s gender is determined “at conception.” This notion drew heavy criticism and ridicule, especially from Delaware Representative Sarah McBride, the first openly transgender person elected to Congress.

Legal expert Mark Joseph Stern lambasted the order, calling it a badly written, careless piece-a structuring that would make the statement that those decrees have been “obviously assisted by AI” stand out, including what appeared to him as attention to detail-naive approaches alas, very typical in Trump’s crafting of legal documents. He stressed that there is nothing to indicate whether or not Trump and his legal team had attempted to correct some of the sloppy legal practices that characterized his earlier years. If this continues, such practices could be detrimental to their future court cases.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to follow my whatsapp channel